AI & Law: When AI Is Judging Human Judges

Lance Eliot
5 min readOct 31, 2024
Mind-bending aspects of AI judging human judges are worth exploring

By Dr. Lance Eliot

For a free podcast of this article, visit this link https://ai-law.libsyn.com/website or find our AI & Law podcast series on Spotify, iTunes, iHeartRadio, and other audio services. For the latest trends in AI & Law, see my Forbes column at the link here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/

Key briefing points:

· Trial court cases are routinely appealed and then reviewed by appeals-level judges.

· You rightfully assume that the appeals level judges are humans.

· Some believe that we will inevitably have AI that takes on that role.

· The AI would be allowed to affirm or remand the case.

· Further levels of appeal would consist of human judges (for now).

Section 1: Introduction

Your case didn’t go the way that you had hoped. There seem to be sufficient grounds to launch an appeal. The hope is that an appeals judge will see that the case has a serious defect or legally compelling issue that will turn around the ruling closer in your direction.

Judges at the lower courts are abundantly aware that at some point their judgment is bound to be called into question on appeal.

--

--

Lance Eliot
Lance Eliot

Written by Lance Eliot

Dr. Lance B. Eliot is a renowned global expert on AI, successful startup founder, global CIO/CTO, , was a top exec at a major Venture Capital (VC) firm.